Your cart is empty
Continue ShoppingOMNA Marine Tourniquet (OMT)
$59.99
Availability: Only 1 left in stock
Government Orders contact Contact us here
Features

Independent Peer-Reviewed Research
Results: Thirty-one subjects had arm circumferences ≥30cm. All 540 applications were effective.
Conclusions: The OMNA Marine Tourniquet can be self-applied effectively, including one-handed applications.
2. Special Operations Medicine Spring 2021 Journal:
Limb Position Change Affects Tourniquet Pressure
Results: Sitting thigh occlusion pressures leg bent were higher than straight.
Conclusions: Passive limb position changes can cause significant changes in tourniquet pressure. Therefore, tourniquet adequacy should be reassessed after any limb position change.
Results: The mean percentage loss of tensile strength for the CAT tourniquet webbing was −19% at 3-months and −87% at 6-months. In contrast, the mean percentage loss of tensile strength for the OMT tourniquet webbing was −2% at 3-months and −16% at 6-months.
Conclusions: The OMNA Marine Tourniquet Gen 2 webbing demonstrated significantly more photodegradation resistance and maintenance of tensile strength compared to the CAT Tourniquet Gen 7 webbing.
Results: The ratcheting marine-designed OMNA ranked the highest for application easiness on both the upper and lower extremities.
Conclusions: Civilian extremity tourniquet self-application on both upper and lower extremities can be accomplished in cold weather conditions despite using cold-weather gloves and technical clothing after receiving brief training. The ratcheting marine-designed OMNA ranked the highest for application ease.
Results: Regarding the upper extremity, OMNA achieved the highest score of 8.5 out of 10. Overall, OMNA was the best performer.
Conclusions: Out of the 5 TQs tested, 60% of subjects preferred OMNA. The study concluded that self-application of commercial TQs are feasible over cold-water anti-exposure suits in the Antarctic climate.
Results: For occluded, tightening system secure applications, from "touch tightening system" to "Done" was fastest with self-securing tightening systems tightening from a tight strap.
Conclusions: Optimal design features for fast, occlusive, secure tourniquet applications are self-securing strap/ redirect systems with an easily identified and easily used clip and self-securing tightening systems.
Results: With the T-OMNA, 46% of the lifeguards successfully stopped the MH compared to 21% with the T-CAT (P = .015). The approach swim time was 135 seconds with the T-OMNA and 131 seconds with the T-CAT (P = .42). The total time (swim time plus tourniquet placement) was 174 seconds with the T-OMNA and 177 seconds with the T-CAT (P = .55). The adjustment time (from securing the Velcro to completing the manipulation of the windlass or ratchet) for the T-OMNA was faster than with the T-CAT (six seconds versus 19 seconds; P < .001; effect size [ES] = 0.83). The perceived fatigue was high, with a score of seven out of ten in both tests (P = .46).
Conclusions: Lifeguards in this study demonstrated the ability to use both tourniquets during aquatic rescues under conditions of fatigue. The tourniquet with the ratcheting-fixation system controlled hemorrhage in less time than the windlass rod-based tourniquet, although achieving complete bleeding control had a low success rate.
OMNA Marine Tourniquet Application
Instructions For Use

Current OMT Estimated CoTCCC Recommendation Score = 40.7
Estimated score is based on published research, real world use reports, and CoTCCC Tourniquet criteria. The minimum score for recommendation is 40 out of 50 + a majority vote by the CoTCCC. OMNA is currently working to meet all efficacy and logistics criteria.
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this product!
Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.



